Monday, April 19, 2010

the speaker

From the standpoint of dialectics, I still can’t agree with the speaker. I contend that when the technology, in other words,the global civilization, is trying to assimilate a traditional culture, the global civilization itself is inevitably the one being as similated at the same time. The interaction of things never ends and the subject and the object continuously exchange their positions. The ubiquitous KFC snack bar is an example of the global civilization’s assault into the traditional civilization. However, it is not difficult to find that meanwhile KFC in China has also got a Chinese label. People needn’t empty their serving tray before they leave while in most western countries people do it as ahabit. In order to survive, KFC now offers not only western flavor but also Chinese flavor, such as Old Beijing Chicken Roll As you can see, the traditional culture is still energetic and full of vitality so that it will never be defeated.
  In sum, the speaker’s assertion that technology and tradition are incompatible begs question. Traditional culture is not only an impetus to the world of technology, but also to the whole human race. I concede that the advancement of technology has changed our culture a lot, but meanwhile the global civilization, which includes modern technology, is also being challenged by our traditional culture. Hegel said, “Those that exist are reasonable.” The traditional culture is still vital and will never be eliminated from the splendid historical stage.
http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs
http://extranet.mivamerchant.com/forums
http://mybebook.com/forum
http://www.evforum.net/forums
http://www.dealighted.com/forum
http://hhfowe.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
http://jfweon.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
http://byhan.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
http://nfwign.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
http://nwogn12.spaces.live.com/default.aspx